本文首发于微信公众号「后厂技术官」

相关文章
Android深入理解四大组件系列
前言
Content Provider做为四大组件之一,通常情况下并没有其他的组件使用频繁,但这不能作为我们不去深入学习它的理由。关于Content Provider一篇文章是写不完的,这一篇文章先来介绍它的启动过程。
1.query方法到AMS的调用过程
在Android IPC机制(四)用ContentProvider进行进程间通信这篇文章我举了一个Content Provider使用的例子,在Activity中我是使用如下代码调用Content Provider的:
| public class ContentProviderActivity extends AppCompatActivity {private final static String TAG = "ContentProviderActivity";
 @Override
 protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
 super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
 setContentView(R.layout.activity_content_provider);
 Uri uri = Uri.parse("content://com.example.liuwangshu.mooncontentprovide.GameProvider");
 ContentValues mContentValues = new ContentValues();
 mContentValues.put("_id", 2);
 mContentValues.put("name", "大航海时代ol");
 mContentValues.put("describe", "最好玩的航海网游");
 getContentResolver().insert(uri, mContentValues);
 Cursor gameCursor = getContentResolver().query(uri, new String[]{"name", "describe"}, null, null, null);
 ...
 }
 }
 
 | 
要想调用Content Provider,首先需要使用注释1处的getContentResolver方法,如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/Java/android/content/ContextWrapper.java
| @Overridepublic ContentResolver getContentResolver() {
 return mBase.getContentResolver();
 }
 
 | 
这里mBase指的是ContextImpl,ContextImpl的getContentResolver方法如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ContextImpl.java
| @Overridepublic ContentResolver getContentResolver() {
 return mContentResolver;
 }
 
 | 
上面的代码return了ApplicationContentResolver类型的mContentResolver对象,ApplicationContentResolver是ContextImpl中的静态内部类,继承自ContentResolver,它在ContextImpl的构造方法中被创建。
当我们调用ContentResolver的insert、query、update等方法时就会启动Content Provider,这里拿query方法来进行举例。
query方法的实现在ApplicationContentResolver的父类ContentResolver中,代码如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/content/ContentResolver.java
| public final @Nullable Cursor query(final @RequiresPermission.Read @NonNull Uri uri,@Nullable String[] projection, @Nullable String selection,
 @Nullable String[] selectionArgs, @Nullable String sortOrder,
 @Nullable CancellationSignal cancellationSignal) {
 Preconditions.checkNotNull(uri, "uri");
 IContentProvider unstableProvider = acquireUnstableProvider(uri);
 ...
 try {
 ...
 try {
 qCursor = unstableProvider.query(mPackageName, uri, projection,
 selection, selectionArgs, sortOrder, remoteCancellationSignal);
 } catch (DeadObjectException e) {
 ...
 }
 ...
 }
 
 | 
在注释1处通过acquireUnstableProvider方法返回IContentProvider类型的unstableProvider对象,在注释2处调用unstableProvider的query方法。我们查看acquireUnstableProvider方法做了什么,如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/content/ContentResolver.java
| public final IContentProvider acquireUnstableProvider(Uri uri) {if (!SCHEME_CONTENT.equals(uri.getScheme())) {
 return null;
 }
 String auth = uri.getAuthority();
 if (auth != null) {
 return acquireUnstableProvider(mContext, uri.getAuthority());
 }
 return null;
 }
 
 | 
注释1处用来检查Uri的scheme是否等于”content”,如果不是则返回null。注释2处调用了acquireUnstableProvider方法,这是个抽象方法,它的实现在ContentResolver的子类ApplicationContentResolver中:
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ContextImpl.java
| @Overrideprotected IContentProvider acquireUnstableProvider(Context c, String auth) {
 return mMainThread.acquireProvider(c,
 ContentProvider.getAuthorityWithoutUserId(auth),
 resolveUserIdFromAuthority(auth), false);
 }
 
 | 
return了ActivityThread类型的mMainThread对象的acquireProvider方法:
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
| public final IContentProvider acquireProvider(Context c, String auth, int userId, boolean stable) {
 final IContentProvider provider = acquireExistingProvider(c, auth, userId, stable);
 if (provider != null) {
 return provider;
 }
 IActivityManager.ContentProviderHolder holder = null;
 try {
 holder = ActivityManagerNative.getDefault().getContentProvider(
 getApplicationThread(), auth, userId, stable);
 } catch (RemoteException ex) {
 throw ex.rethrowFromSystemServer();
 }
 if (holder == null) {
 Slog.e(TAG, "Failed to find provider info for " + auth);
 return null;
 }
 holder = installProvider(c, holder, holder.info,
 true , holder.noReleaseNeeded, stable);
 return holder.provider;
 }
 
 | 
注释1处检查ActivityThread中的ArrayMap类型的mProviderMap中是否有目标ContentProvider存在,有则返回,没有就会在注释2处调用AMP的getContentProvider方法,最终会调用AMS的getContentProvider方法。注释3处的installProvider方法用来将注释2处返回的ContentProvider相关的数据存储在mProviderMap中,起到缓存的作用,这样使用相同的Content Provider时,就不需要每次都要调用AMS的getContentProvider方法。使用我们接着查看AMS的getContentProvider方法,代码如下所示。
frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java
| @Overridepublic final ContentProviderHolder getContentProvider(
 IApplicationThread caller, String name, int userId, boolean stable) {
 ...
 return getContentProviderImpl(caller, name, null, stable, userId);
 }
 
 | 
getContentProvider方法return了getContentProviderImpl方法:
frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java
|    private ContentProviderHolder getContentProviderImpl(IApplicationThread caller,String name, IBinder token, boolean stable, int userId) {
 ...
 ProcessRecord proc = getProcessRecordLocked(
 cpi.processName, cpr.appInfo.uid, false);
 if (proc != null && proc.thread != null && !proc.killed) {
 ...
 if (!proc.pubProviders.containsKey(cpi.name)) {
 checkTime(startTime, "getContentProviderImpl: scheduling install");
 proc.pubProviders.put(cpi.name, cpr);
 try {
 proc.thread.scheduleInstallProvider(cpi);
 } catch (RemoteException e) {
 }
 }
 } else {
 checkTime(startTime, "getContentProviderImpl: before start process");
 proc = startProcessLocked(cpi.processName,
 cpr.appInfo, false, 0, "content provider",
 new ComponentName(cpi.applicationInfo.packageName,
 cpi.name), false, false, false);
 checkTime(startTime, "getContentProviderImpl: after start process");
 ...
 }
 ...
 
 }
 
 | 
getContentProviderImpl方法的代码很多,这里截取了关键的部分。注释1处通过getProcessRecordLocked方法来获取目标ContentProvider的应用程序进程信息,这些信息用ProcessRecord类型的proc来表示,如果该应用进程已经启动就会调用注释2处的代码,否则就会调用注释3的startProcessLocked方法来启动进程。这里我们假设ContentProvider的应用进程还没有启动,关于应用进程启动过程,我在Android应用程序进程启动过程(前篇)已经讲过,最终会调用ActivityThread的main方法,代码如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
| public static void main(String[] args) {...
 Looper.prepareMainLooper();
 ActivityThread thread = new ActivityThread();
 thread.attach(false);
 if (sMainThreadHandler == null) {
 sMainThreadHandler = thread.getHandler();
 }
 if (false) {
 Looper.myLooper().setMessageLogging(new
 LogPrinter(Log.DEBUG, "ActivityThread"));
 }
 
 Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER);
 Looper.loop();
 throw new RuntimeException("Main thread loop unexpectedly exited");
 }
 
 | 
注释1处通过prepareMainLooper方法在ThreadLocal中获取Looper,并在注释3处开启消息循环。在注释2处创建了ActivityThread并调用了它的attach方法:
  frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
|   private void attach(boolean system) {...
 final IActivityManager mgr = ActivityManagerNative.getDefault();
 try {
 mgr.attachApplication(mAppThread);
 } catch (RemoteException ex) {
 throw ex.rethrowFromSystemServer();
 }
 ...
 }
 
 | 
注释1处最终会得到AMS,在注释2处调用AMS的attachApplication方法,并将ApplicationThread类型的mAppThread对象传进去。
query方法到AMS的调用过程,如下面时序图所示(省略应用程序进程启动过程)。

2.AMS启动Content Provider的过程
我们接着来查看AMS的attachApplication方法,如下所示。
frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java
| @Overridepublic final void attachApplication(IApplicationThread thread) {
 synchronized (this) {
 int callingPid = Binder.getCallingPid();
 final long origId = Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
 attachApplicationLocked(thread, callingPid);
 Binder.restoreCallingIdentity(origId);
 }
 }
 
 | 
attachApplication方法中又调用了attachApplicationLocked方法:
frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java
|    private final boolean attachApplicationLocked(IApplicationThread thread,int pid) {
 ...
 thread.bindApplication(processName, appInfo, providers, app.instrumentationClass,
 profilerInfo, app.instrumentationArguments, app.instrumentationWatcher,
 app.instrumentationUiAutomationConnection, testMode,
 mBinderTransactionTrackingEnabled, enableTrackAllocation,
 isRestrictedBackupMode || !normalMode, app.persistent,
 new Configuration(mConfiguration), app.compat,
 getCommonServicesLocked(app.isolated),
 mCoreSettingsObserver.getCoreSettingsLocked());
 ...
 }
 
 | 
attachApplicationLocked方法中调用了thread的bindApplication方法,thread是IApplicationThread类型的,从类型名字就可以看出来是用于进程间通信,这里实现bindApplication方法的是ApplicationThreadProxy类,它实现了IApplicationThread接口。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ApplicationThreadNative.java
| class ApplicationThreadProxy implements IApplicationThread {...
 @Override
 public final void bindApplication(String packageName, ApplicationInfo info,
 List<ProviderInfo> providers, ComponentName testName, ProfilerInfo profilerInfo,
 Bundle testArgs, IInstrumentationWatcher testWatcher,
 IUiAutomationConnection uiAutomationConnection, int debugMode,
 boolean enableBinderTracking, boolean trackAllocation, boolean restrictedBackupMode,
 boolean persistent, Configuration config, CompatibilityInfo compatInfo,
 Map<String, IBinder> services, Bundle coreSettings) throws RemoteException {
 ...
 mRemote.transact(BIND_APPLICATION_TRANSACTION, data, null,
 IBinder.FLAG_ONEWAY);
 data.recycle();
 }
 ...
 }
 
 | 
到目前为止,上面的调用过程还是在AMS进程中执行的,因此,需要通过IBinder类型的mRemote对象向新创建的应用程序进程(目标Content Provider所在的进程)发送BIND_APPLICATION_TRANSACTION类型的通信请求。处理这个通信请求的是在新创建的应用程序进程中执行的ApplicationThread的bindApplication方法,如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
| public final void bindApplication(String processName, ApplicationInfo appInfo,List<ProviderInfo> providers, ComponentName instrumentationName,
 ProfilerInfo profilerInfo, Bundle instrumentationArgs,
 IInstrumentationWatcher instrumentationWatcher,
 IUiAutomationConnection instrumentationUiConnection, int debugMode,
 boolean enableBinderTracking, boolean trackAllocation,
 boolean isRestrictedBackupMode, boolean persistent, Configuration config,
 CompatibilityInfo compatInfo, Map<String, IBinder> services, Bundle coreSettings) {
 ...
 sendMessage(H.BIND_APPLICATION, data);
 }
 
 | 
调用sendMessage方法像H发送BIND_APPLICATION类型消息,H的handleMessage方法如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
|    public void handleMessage(Message msg) {if (DEBUG_MESSAGES) Slog.v(TAG, ">>> handling: " + codeToString(msg.what));
 switch (msg.what) {
 ...
 case BIND_APPLICATION:
 Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER, "bindApplication");
 AppBindData data = (AppBindData)msg.obj;
 handleBindApplication(data);
 Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER);
 break;
 ...
 }
 ...
 }
 
 | 
我们接着查看handleBindApplication方法:
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
| private void handleBindApplication(AppBindData data) {...
 final ContextImpl appContext = ContextImpl.createAppContext(this, data.info);
 try {
 final ClassLoader cl = instrContext.getClassLoader();
 mInstrumentation = (Instrumentation)
 cl.loadClass(data.instrumentationName.getClassName()).newInstance();
 } catch (Exception e) {
 ...
 }
 final ComponentName component = new ComponentName(ii.packageName, ii.name);
 mInstrumentation.init(this, instrContext, appContext, component,
 data.instrumentationWatcher, data.instrumentationUiAutomationConnection);
 ...
 Application app = data.info.makeApplication(data.restrictedBackupMode, null);
 mInitialApplication = app;
 if (!data.restrictedBackupMode) {
 if (!ArrayUtils.isEmpty(data.providers)) {
 installContentProviders(app, data.providers);
 mH.sendEmptyMessageDelayed(H.ENABLE_JIT, 10*1000);
 }
 }
 ...
 mInstrumentation.callApplicationOnCreate(app);
 ...
 }
 
 | 
handleBindApplication方法的代码很长,这里截取了主要的部分。注释1处创建了ContextImpl 。注释2处通过反射创建Instrumentation并在注释3处初始化Instrumentation。注释4处创建Application并且在注释6处调用Application的onCreate方法,这意味着Content Provider所在的应用程序进程已经启动完毕,在这之前,注释5处调用installContentProviders方法来启动Content Provider,代码如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
| private void installContentProviders(Context context, List<ProviderInfo> providers) {
 final ArrayList<IActivityManager.ContentProviderHolder> results =
 new ArrayList<IActivityManager.ContentProviderHolder>();
 
 for (ProviderInfo cpi : providers) {
 ...
 IActivityManager.ContentProviderHolder cph = installProvider(context, null, cpi,
 false , true , true );
 ...
 }
 
 try {
 ActivityManagerNative.getDefault().publishContentProviders(
 getApplicationThread(), results);
 } catch (RemoteException ex) {
 throw ex.rethrowFromSystemServer();
 }
 }
 
 | 
注释1处遍历当前应用程序进程的ProviderInfo列表,得到每个Content Provider的ProviderInfo(存储Content Provider的信息),并在注释2处调用installProvider方法来启动这些Content Provider。在注释3处通过AMS的publishContentProviders方法将这些Content Provider存储在AMS的mProviderMap中,这个mProviderMap在前面提到过,起到缓存的作用,防止每次使用相同的Content Provider时都会调用AMS的getContentProvider方法。来查看installProvider方法时如何启动Content Provider的,installProvider方法如下所示。
frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityThread.java
| private IActivityManager.ContentProviderHolder installProvider(Context context,IActivityManager.ContentProviderHolder holder, ProviderInfo info,
 boolean noisy, boolean noReleaseNeeded, boolean stable) {
 ContentProvider localProvider = null;
 ...
 final java.lang.ClassLoader cl = c.getClassLoader();
 localProvider = (ContentProvider)cl.
 loadClass(info.name).newInstance();
 provider = localProvider.getIContentProvider();
 if (provider == null) {
 ...
 return null;
 }
 if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) Slog.v(
 TAG, "Instantiating local provider " + info.name);
 localProvider.attachInfo(c, info);
 } catch (java.lang.Exception e) {
 ...
 }
 return null;
 }
 }
 ...
 return retHolder;
 }
 
 | 
在注释1处通过反射来创建ContentProvider类型的localProvider对象,并在注释2处调用了它的attachInfo方法:
frameworks/base/core/java/android/content/ContentProvider.java
| private void attachInfo(Context context, ProviderInfo info, boolean testing) {...
 ContentProvider.this.onCreate();
 }
 }
 
 | 
在attachInfo方法中调用了onCreate方法,它是一个抽象方法。这样Content Provider就启动完毕。
最后给出AMS启动Content Provider的时序图。
